Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 4:57:09 GMT -5
AQuality Assurance in Higher Education the latest external evaluation report of the doctoral school b carry out its own analysis regarding the fulfillment within the field for which approval is requested of criterion provided in the annex which is an integral part of this methodology c based on the analysis from letter b formulates the proposal for approval or rejection of the education providers request. The approval of the new doctoral fields within the accredited doctoral schools is certified by order of the Minister of National Education and Scientific Research. CHAPTER IV Appeal procedure Art. . In the event of any appeals the following successive stages of work will be completed.
A the education provider who requested the Country Email List authorisationaccreditationperiodic evaluation of a doctoral school submits the appeal to the authorized agency that issued the opinion within calendar days from the date of communication to the education provider of the authorized agencys opinion b the authorized agency will request the nomination of one expert each from CNATDCU CNCS respectively from representative student federations at national level and will appoint its own representative in order to set up the appeal committee.
The evaluators will be different from those who performed the first evaluation and will have competences in the fieldfields included in the structure of the doctoral school and will reflect as much as possible the diversity of these fields.by representative student federations at the national level will be carried out within working days from the request made by the authorized agency c the analysis of appeals will be carried out exclusively on the basis of the existing documents in the selfevaluation report submitted by the education provider the documents and information collected by the evaluation commission as well as other documentsdatainformation produced in the evaluation process by CNATDCU CNCS or the authorized agency d the results of the checks are recorded in a dispute resolution report that will.
A the education provider who requested the Country Email List authorisationaccreditationperiodic evaluation of a doctoral school submits the appeal to the authorized agency that issued the opinion within calendar days from the date of communication to the education provider of the authorized agencys opinion b the authorized agency will request the nomination of one expert each from CNATDCU CNCS respectively from representative student federations at national level and will appoint its own representative in order to set up the appeal committee.
The evaluators will be different from those who performed the first evaluation and will have competences in the fieldfields included in the structure of the doctoral school and will reflect as much as possible the diversity of these fields.by representative student federations at the national level will be carried out within working days from the request made by the authorized agency c the analysis of appeals will be carried out exclusively on the basis of the existing documents in the selfevaluation report submitted by the education provider the documents and information collected by the evaluation commission as well as other documentsdatainformation produced in the evaluation process by CNATDCU CNCS or the authorized agency d the results of the checks are recorded in a dispute resolution report that will.